The Supreme Court of India on Thursday said that its not inclined to entertain a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) seeking intervention against hate speeches or inflammatory speeches by public figures.
The PIL requested that the court issue directives for establishing guidelines to prevent provocative rhetoric and to require penal action against individuals making statements that could threaten public order or the nation's sovereignty.
The bench said it was not making observations on the merits of the case. The PIL was filed by ‘Hindu Sena Samiti'. The PIL requested that the court issue directives for establishing guidelines to prevent provocative rhetoric and to require penal action against individuals making statements that could threaten public order or the nation's sovereignty.
In his remarks, Verma had allegedly warned of a potential popular uprising, drawing comparisons to the protests in Sri Lanka and Bangladesh, while Tikait allegedly referenced the farmers' protests in a manner that suggested the possibility of violent insurrection, reported PTI.
PIL Hate Speech Inflammatory Speeches Supreme Court PIL Hate Speech Inflammatory Speeches
इंडिया ताज़ा खबर, इंडिया मुख्य बातें
Similar News:आप इससे मिलती-जुलती खबरें भी पढ़ सकते हैं जिन्हें हमने अन्य समाचार स्रोतों से एकत्र किया है।
‘Whole World Will Come Over...’: Delhi HC Dismisses Plea Seeking Rohingya Children’s School AdmissionThe Delhi High Court on Tuesday refused to entertain the plea seeking directions to the authorities concerned to allow school admissions of Rohingya refugees children.
और पढो »
‘Unknown To Any Civilised System...’: SC Issues Guidelines On ‘Bulldozer Justice’Supreme Court issued its first guidelines aimed at curbing arbitrary demolitions by state authorities on Wednesday, stating that citizens rights cannot be suppressed under the threat of property destruction.
और पढो »
Child Marriage पर Supreme Court का बड़ा फैसला, जारी की गई ये Guidelines SC Guidelines On Child Marriage: बाल विवाह पर सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने अहम फैसला सुनाया है. सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने बाल विवाह पर गाइडलाइन जारी कर कहा है कि बाल विवाह रोकथाम अधिनियम को किसी भी व्यक्तिगत कानून के तहत परंपराओं से बाधित नहीं किया जा सकता है.
और पढो »
Chandannagar: হকারদের বিক্ষোভের মধ্যেই হাজির বিশাল পুলিস বাহিনী-জেসিবি, আচমকাই বদলে গেল পরিস্থিতি...Eviction programme near Chandannagar rail station stoped due to Supreme court court order
और पढो »
Supreme Court Next CJI: సుప్రీంకోర్టు తదుపరి సీజేఐగా జస్టిస్ సంజీవ్ ఖన్నా, ఎవరీ సంజీవ్ ఖన్నాJustice Sanjiv Khanna as next Chief justice of Supreme court Supreme Court Next CJI: సుప్రీంకోర్టు ప్రధాన న్యాయమూర్తి జస్టిస్ డీవై చంద్రచూడ్ పదవీకాలం నవంబర్ 10తో ముగియనుంది.
और पढो »
Supreme Court Rules Against Arbitrary Bulldozer Demolitions, Citing Due ProcesIn a significant verdict on the “bulldozer actions” by state governments, the Supreme Court on Wednesday ruled that authorities cannot demolish a persons home simply because they are accused of a crime.
और पढो »