The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday handed another setback to gun rights advocates ...
FILE PHOTO: A bump fire stock that attaches to a semi-automatic rifle to increase the firing rate is seen at Good Guys Gun Shop in Orem, Utah, U.S., October 4, 2017. REUTERS/George Frey/File Photo
With two conservative justices dissenting, the court refused to temporarily exempt from the ban a group of plaintiffs including the Firearms Policy Foundation while their legal challenge continues to be litigated in Washington. The ban, which went into effect on March 26, was embraced by Trump following a 2017 massacre in Las Vegas that killed 58 people in which the gunman used bump stocks.
The challengers then returned to the Supreme Court to try to prevent the policy from applying specifically to them. In Friday’s order, Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch said they would have granted the request to exempt the challengers.
इंडिया ताज़ा खबर, इंडिया मुख्य बातें
Similar News:आप इससे मिलती-जुलती खबरें भी पढ़ सकते हैं जिन्हें हमने अन्य समाचार स्रोतों से एकत्र किया है।
The Supreme Court rules that a murderer has no right to a “painless death”The 5-4 vote reveals stark differences among the justices
और पढो »
Supreme Court denies request to put bump stock regulation on holdThe Supreme Court allows the federal ban on bump stocks to go into effect, denying a request from gun rights groups to temporarily block it
और पढो »
Suspect in New Zealand massacre to face more charges in court on FridayAustralian Brenton Tarrant will appear in court in New Zealand on Friday, where ...
और पढो »
WaPo: Trump plans to fight tax returns up to the Supreme CourtThe Washington Post reports that according to two administration officials, 'Privately, Trump has told White House advisers that he does not plan to hand over his tax returns to Congress and that he would fight the issue to the Supreme Court, hoping to stall it until after the 2020 election.'
और पढो »
The Supreme Court grants a Buddhist’s plea for a spiritual adviser at his executionThe 7-2 decision comes weeks after a 5-4 decision denying a Muslim man’s similar request
और पढो »
This Supreme Court ruling is exceptionally cruelCNN News, delivered. Select from our newsletters below and enter your email to subscribe.
और पढो »
It's Neil Gorsuch's Supreme Court Now, Not Anthony Kennedy'sAnalysis: The Supreme Court's post-Kennedy era may have come Monday, in the justices’ sharply divided 5-4 ruling in Bucklew v. Precythe—rejecting a Missouri death-row inmate’s claim that his execution by lethal injection would violate the Eighth Amendment
और पढो »
Supreme Court affirms capital punishment despite risks of painThe Supreme Court this week, in a narrow 5-4 decision, offered a sweeping defense of the death penalty, including in cases when an inmate faces the risk of extreme pain.
और पढो »